A Greater Freedom – Sex and Love for Real

Last week I posted on the 40th anniversary of Humanae Vitae, looking at the aftermath and the effects on the individuals, families, the Church, and society as a whole. While not explaining the teachings per se, that post inferred from the predicted effects (which were seen as inevitable consequences should contraception be widely adopted, which was the case) that Humanae Vitae was clearly right.

One response (read it here) that I received took fundamental exception to both that conclusion and Humanae Vitae itself. This is a response to those comments.

I need to start by point out that what you oppose is not the Church’s teaching, plain and simple. Even more to the point, the reasoning that you attribute to the Catholic Church is not part of the Church’s thinking.

It is true that what you oppose is commonly attributed to the Church, yet it remains not so – perhaps it would be better labeled as common misperception.

Bear with me a moment, and I will try to offer some things up for you to consider, clarify what the Church does in fact, teach and why, and perhaps raise some questions for you to ponder. By necessity this will be the barest of overviews, so it is my sincere hope that you will find this intriguing enough to investigate further. Therefore, I will finish with a few resources for going deeper.

Foundations of Teaching
What the Church proposes for our belief in sexuality (of which the teachings on contraception are only a small, but important part) are precisely intended to bring us closer to the one who made us, to conform us more closely to Him, to enable us to understand and experience real joy.

In short, to teach us how to love.

On the other hand, what the world proposes for our belief about sexuality is entirely centered on ourselves – how does my partner make me feel, how am I most fulfilled, what will make my life better … this isn’t really authentic sexuality at all, but simply a shallow counterfeit, a caricature of what could be. It most definitely does not lead to genuine love … and the world is relentless.

Christ teaches us another way. In fact, His entire life teaches us that love is truly much more about sacrifice, self-donation, about losing our self, even losing our very lives … and as we know, that very disregard for ourselves is precisely the center in which we find who we really are, where God returns everything we could have been and far, far more.

The contrast could not be more fundamental.

Every parent knows this, of course, though not all see the gift. Admittedly, it’s hard to to truly appreciate our “school of love” while trudging down the hall in the wee hours with no sleep, a screaming baby or two in tow, and barf running down our clothes. Or perhaps when our tools or favorite book is lost or damaged, and not by our hands. Or yet again when when we receive some large medical bills even while we have bills – even the most basic ones – that remain unpaid.

Yet in each of these – and so many more, the list is nearly endless – we are presented with a chance to turn away from ourselves, and to turn toward others. Turn away from ourselves, and towards God. To learn how life is truly designed to be.

In fact, it is in just this sort of mutual self-donation, in marriage as a continual mutual gift of self, that we are truly gifted with love.

A Central Role
Where then, does our sexuality fit in?


As Christopher West puts it in The Good News About Sex and Marriage,

“Love one another as I have loved you” (John 15:12). These words of Christ sum up the meaning of life and the meaning of human sexuality. At its core, sexual morality is about expressing God’s love through our bodies. This is why Pope John Paul II can say that if we live according to the truth of our sexuality, we fulfill the very meaning of our being and existence.

Ponder that a moment, and see if it sounds repressive.

West goes on to say

Sex, then, is by no means a peripheral issue. In fact, Pope John Paul II says the call to “nuptial love” revealed through our sexuality is “the fundamental element of human existence in the world” … He even insists that we can’t understand Christianity if we don’t understand the truth and meaning of our sexuality.

Marriage as a Revelation About God
God is, in Himself, a family. The Father makes an eternal gift of himself to the Son, as does the Son to the Father. The love between them is is so profound that it is an entirely new person, the Holy Spirit … and this is the pattern for our families.

Again from West

This is what we embody as male and female. Sex is so beautiful, so wonderful, so glorious, that it’s meant to express God’s free, total, faithful, and fruitful love.

In our marriages we image the reality of God, in our marriage embrace we reaffirm our marriage vows. Not just in words, but in deed … sealing our mental and spiritual commitments with out physical bodies.

In that embrace, fully understanding where we are and what we do, we can express our total and complete gift of self to our spouse. We learn how to love.

I think that if you reflect on this a bit, perhaps you will begin to see why the Church teaches that separating the physical act from the possibility of life is, by definition, a non-starter. Shorn of meaning, our actions descend from their intended place, and we drift farther from our intended dignity.

Or to put it another way, the very possibility of life is so inexorably intertwined in the very meaning of marriage, that we will choose a certain poverty of existence to separate the marital embrace from that possibility.

Pleasure and Meaning
Though lacking this transcendant meaning, it is still safe to say that a really good meal is likewise enjoyable. Of course I’m not making relative comparisons here – I’m simply observing that eating a good meal does result in pleasure.

The pleasure itself is a great thing, certainly a gift from God … and most Christians thank God for the provisions of each meal beforehand.

Of course at least part of that thanksgiving comes from the simple fact that we need nutrition, and the meal will satisfy those needs (at least for the moment!). So in addition to being pleasurable, eating food has an intended purpose.

What then, do we say happens when somebody purposefully throws up after eating? Obviously it is a disorder … bullimia. A person who purposely separates the act of eating from the intended purpose of consuming food has a problem. It doesn’t matter that they get more and more pleasure from eating more and more food … what matters is that they regain balance, learn to connect the act of eating with its intended biological purpose.

Of course the pleasure itself was good, so far as it went. But it wasn’t the ultimate meaning. Besides, anyone who has struggled with an eating disorder (and here I speak from my own experience) will also tell you that the pleasure itself diminishes, that it takes on a hollow quality when separated from it’s natural place.

In Meaning Comes Fulfillment
Notice that I am not saying that each time a married couple has sex it must result in a pregnancy – that would be absurd. I am also not saying that couples that contracept either get no pleasure nor benefit in their relationship in any way. What I am saying is the fullest richness of married life will come when our sexual lives are lived as intended by the one who made us, who knows us better than we know ourselves … and that means being open to the possibility of life, allowing God to make the final decision.

That is why the Church forbids all contraception – both artificial and otherwise. It has always done so (not just 40 years ago … I discussed that in several places in the last post), and will always do so. All Humanae Vitae did was acknowledge that the Church did not have the authority to rule differently in this area – that it had to continue to proclaim what was always understood to be true.

Truth simply cannot be subject to a vote.

In fact, when asked years later to reflect on each of his encyclicals (teaching documents, Pope Paul VI is reported to have spent five or ten minutes for each encyclical excitedly recounting what was on his mind, what points he was trying to convey, what needs of the Church he was trying to address, and so forth.

Yet when he got to Humanae Vitae, he grew quiet and simply said “I did not betray the truth”.

Natural Family Planning
With regards to Natural Family Planning (here, here and elsewhere), the difference is clear – NFP simply is not contraception. That is, couples who use NFP are not separating the meaning of the sexual act from the act itself … rather, they are acknowledging that meaning and living it in their very lives. Choosing to refrain from sex at any particular time is just not the same thing as changing the sexual act itself … these are no more alike than skipping a meal is the same thing as gorging and barfing.

There are tons of benefits and practical aspects to NFP – and yes, there can certainly be some frustrations as well – but that is really a discussion for another day.

The Authority of the Church
So where does the Church fit into all this? Simple – the Catholic Church has always understood (see Matthew 16:18+ and more), and faithful Catholics acknowedge and appreciate, that the Church has the responsibility to represent Jesus here on earth, to proclaim the Good News till the end of time, to faithfully teach what is true and right (whether or not it is fashionable or easy to accept), to guide Christians in their journeys towards God.

This does not mean that members and leaders of the Church have not sinned and strayed far from the truth – this is a sad reality of our battle with sin – but it does mean that Catholics can trust the Church to be right on matters of faith and morals.

While it is true that many people who call themselves Catholic dissent from teachings of the Church, that does not make the teachings wrong. In fact, something that I heard a few years back has been a big help to me in this area.

Clearly for all of us there are times when it may be difficult to understand or accept particular teachings – after all, we are all still on our journeys towards God. A more profitable approach to teachings that don’t yet make sense is to first accept them as true, then pray for understanding. That understanding will inevitably follow, and this approach has a big added benefit – we learn to trust God, then are drawn closer to truth, and therefore to God Himself. This is a direct result of trusting God to do as he says … “seek and you will find”.

Faith and Science
Faith is never in opposition to honest science – it can’t be, as they both reveal aspects of truth, and truth can never in opposition to itself. Faith reveals aspects of spiritual realities, and science reveals aspects of the physical world. Not only can these go hand in hand, the truth is they must go hand in hand. It is when they don’t that the trouble begins.


Keep in mind that science can tell us how something works, or what is involved in making something happen. What it cannot tell us is why something happens, or whether we should take a particular action or not – that is, whether it is moral and just. That is the domain of faith.

The Church has always understood this to be true – that is why the father of modern chemistry is St. Albert the Great, why Catholic priests largely developed the scientific method, and much, much more. For that matter, the man who discovered genetics – Gregor Mendel – was a Catholic priest.

This is why the Church encourages the advancement of science, and reveres great scientific and engineering accomplishments … and will continue to oppose those that contravene spiritual realities. You might find it interesting to note that in Humanae Vitae itself Pope Paul VI contained an appeal to scientists to apply their skills and talents into this area, that we might benefit from the knowledge gained.

A Few Parting Thoughts
In your last comments you stated that “there are plenty of dogmatic church teachings that create a repressive attitude about sex and I think that this is one of them”. I would hope that if you reflect on what the Church actually teaches about sexuality (of which this is the very briefest of introductions) that you will see that far from being repressive, what the Church teaches enables us to understand and participate in the real meaning of sexuality, and in doing so to learn how to live truly free.

After all, what greater freedom can there be than to live as God intends us?

Places to Look for More
Early in his pontificate Pope John Paul II developed what came to be known as the “Theology of the Body” … a fantastic set of teachings that show how God reveals Himself through our physical bodies.

Christopher West has a very good apostolate dedicated to spreading these teachings in popular forms and language. Here are some select resources:

Christopher West also has a number of good talks on video and audio.

A Greater Freedom – Sex and Love for Real

4 thoughts on “A Greater Freedom – Sex and Love for Real

  1. Arlo says:

    Well, it’s late, I’m tired and I don’t want to write a thesis, but a couple of thoughts…

    I get the argument that sex outside of its natural state guts the act, takes away God’s revelation and puts the focus on self satisfaction. I just think the argument is thin. Sex is not just about procreation. It’s about a couple enjoying each other physically and emotionally. It can be a deep bonding experience. Introducing the possibility of an unwanted pregnancy doesn’t create reverence. It creates fear and anxiety. Reverence for the act is expressed through love and faithfulness.

    But, let me talk about the practicalities. Marriage is hard. It’s really hard. Life is short. Sex is fun and scientifically proven to be healthy to a couple both emotionally and physically. I’ve heard plenty within the Christian movement about women submitting to their husbands. Little emphasis is placed on helping women to actually enjoy the act and plenty is put on marital duties and obligations. It creates dysfunction, shame and ultimately dissatisfaction within the marriage. Women are taught to go along, but hate it and resent it.

    But I think the argument is undermined altogether by NFP. NFP’s goal is simple: recreational sex. It’s about having sex for pleasure, not for procreation. Leaving the possibility of getting pregnant (although nfp is supposed to make this possibility as remote as possible) feels more like an act of guilt than worship.

    I’m trying to understand why sex in particular gets this treatment and not the many other ways we could keep life in its natural state. There are a lot of hang ups about sex, like guilt over liking it. I suppose that’s why we’re cautioned about how we view it. Like it, but don’t lose perspective.

    Faithfulness, love, marriage. That’s perspective.

  2. bob says:

    I agree one-billion percent that marriage is hard, and will almost certainly be extraordinarily hard at times. At one of kid’s wedding (Jen & Tony) Fr. Vowels said something that really stuck with me (and this is a very rough paraphrase):

    marriage isn’t a sacrament to celebrate what already took place, it’s a sacrament to make marriage even possible at all (through the inevitable difficulties).

    I have also seen too many times emphasis is placed on duties, often disproportionate to the wife. That stinks.

    The real key is to view marriage as mutual self-donation – yes there are different roles, but the cost is the same – 100%. Eveything. Todo. All you got. Nothing left.

    Of course “the marital embrace” is fun – as it was designed to and absolutely should be! Yes a couple can and should enjoy each other physically and emotionally – but even better each should provide that enjoyment to the other …

    The problems in marriage will most definitely come, yet … it’s precisely in those hard times that we have a chance to really learn dependence on God, and that is where we will begin to experience lasting, authentic joy.

    I hear what you think about NFP, but let me gently suggest that the real purpose is to learn total dependence on God and each other, in the most intimate and durable part of our lives. NFP should be about neither guilt nor worship, but intimacy with each other and with God.

    As for why this whole area is emphasized, I can offer a couple of reasons (this is only my perspective – nothing more).

    First, it is absolutely the only opportunity that we have in our entire lives to cooperate with God directly and bring a new life, a new eternal soul into existence. Think about it: each new person is someone who not only did not exist before, but will be able to live beyond the end of time itself!

    Absolutely nothing else we do can endure like that. In fact, very little we do will even endure to the end of our own lives, much less a few years beyond.

    The only things that outlast time are people – so by that measure it’s the stuff that we do to help people attain salvation (which starts with coming into existence) that really matter.

    Second, this whole area of life (from the creation of new people, to the murder of innocents, to the dignified death of the very sick and elderly) is probably where we (humans) have taken the most damage from the other side – and it’s way past time to take a stand.

    At any rate, sex as intended – husband and wife, open to life, God has the final say – will be not only guilt-free, fun, promote intimacy, encourage the spouses, and solidify a marriage against all challenges to come, it will also bring the couple each closer to God for that moment when life ends … and yes, God willing it will occasionally result in the most awesome event imaginable – a new life!

    Anyhow, thanks again for explaining your concerns – I appreciate the discussion. I’m sure that I’m missing much of what you’re thinking, so thanks for your patience.

  3. bob says:

    The opening scene from Monty Python’s “The Meaning of Life” is certainly something I’ve seen more than once, and laughed my butt off – but the truth is that was mostly before I understood a bit more.

    Still a funny Python skit, I suppose – but I don’t laugh quite so much anymore. Mostly because it misses the point and satirizes something other than what the Church teaches, but probably more because there is so much at stake here.

    They’re making fun of something they fundamentally don’t understand.

    On the other hand, there’s always the Black Knight in the Woods …

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s